Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Malcolm Conn's avatar

I guess the WTC doesn’t matter when you’re 6th on the table with no chance of making the final. Bit embarrassing when it’s played in England and the home team can’t make the final for the third cycle in a row. Australia often talk about the WTC and were delighted to win it last year. It’s essential to end “dead rubber syndrome”, especially when England are being flogged in a 5 Test series. Can’t wait for the Poms to arrive next year so they can add to their 1-8 losing record for series in Australia since 1990. During that time England have won 6 Ashes Tests in Australia - Australia have won 34….

Aditya Roy's avatar

I totally understand the point that Stokes is making that why the points should be docked if the test matches are finishing inside five days. But, I also see the logic of spectators and viewers paying money to watch 90 overs bowled in a day. And, of there is any chance of four day tests matches happening in future, then it is imperative that minimum 90 overs are bowled in a day. Again, I get the point that Stokes made that it is difficult to have 90 overs in a day when you are playing with only fast bowlers on certain pitches in England, New Zealand and Australia and a bit easier in Asia where you can play with two-three spinners and they get their overs quickly.

And, on the aspect of WTC I think it is very much important for countries like Sri Lanka, Windies, Proteas and Blackcaps though England can find joy and reverence from winning the Ashes which they haven't won since 2015.

6 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?