Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ruth Livingstone's avatar

I'm with you in this, Neil. I note in Australia that Mitchell Starc (among others) has been able to pick his preferred format. Great players should get extra consideration, given their ability to add quality when they play.

Edwin Ross's avatar

Although we do miss players like Klaasen and AB, I do think it's wrong when players, contracted to CSA only want to play in those tournaments that suit themselves. So I can understand perhaps why these players have not been chosen.

On a slightly, if I may, different note. Can someone tell me why it is necessary to select so many different players over the three formats? Surely any bowler worth anything should be able to adjust his line and length to whatever format he's playing in? I'd go along with maybe one or two maybe not meeting the requirements for one or other of the formats. But just how many different bowlers have been used over the past year or two? It is no longer any sign of merit or needing to be special to be awarded a Protea cap as they are now issued to just about anyone. Perhaps Niel, you'd like to ask your statistician, if you have one, to supply us with the number of different players that have been used across these formats with special attention being given to the bowlers? Surely, it is better to stick to those players that are identified as being the best and give them game time? Obviously, injuries and replacements for injured players must be taken into account. But it'is still ridiculous the amount of players that have been used.

My opinion and subject to be attacked for it. Ha ha.

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?