Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Richard Asher's avatar

Thanks for highlighting the semantics around 'excuses' and 'reasons'. I've always thought this an essentially absurd distinction. Or at least, it's one that has become so in the sporting world, thanks to these terms being abused and tarnished.

That's particularly true in South Africa. Our macho culture and educational traditions (which are pretty well represented in most Proteas dressing rooms) have stigmatised anything that might sound remotely like an 'excuse', be it on the sports field or any aspect of life. Men don't complain, etc, etc. 'Okes' who point to any external factors in failure are mercilessly ribbed from a young age. In this culture, there is no such thing as a valid reason for something going wrong. Anything going against you must always be 100% down to your own lack of application. Which is plainly absurd. Taken to extremes, this assumption makes proper analysis and progress almost imossible. And it can mean you start fixing things that aren't broken.

As you suggest, the travel/jetlag/preparation issues ARE issues - how else can such a turnaround following the India series be explained? But if some kind of schoolboy hangover means nobody can talk about those issues without risking ridicule and being called an excuse-maker, nothing will change. Players keeping silent on this in some primal effort to show they can 'vasbyt' means administrators won't EVER get the message that jetlag and the virtual elimination of tour matches is counter-productive for the game and ultimately means those administators have fewer tickets to sell when games collapse after two days.

Expand full comment
Jost Wiederhold's avatar

Whoever makes the decisions on the tour conditions is predominantly the cause of the nightmare that was experienced by the players. They were not just sleep walking.

Can you image this scenario. If the cricket board makes the arrangements, which is highly probable, while the players realise they are being put out for slaughter. They are not stupid. There would be obvious dissent unexpressed to the public by the other half of the cricket management, i.e., manager, captain and senior players. This latter group were not in a position to criticize the board for two reasons, code of conduct and the underlying confrontation relating to Boucher.

Where a body is out of synchronization and harmony within itself It cannot perform optimally. A fundamental law of nature!!!!l

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts